China Patent Skill
中国专利 Skill 对比与选型：技能库、人工代理师还是定制 RAG
按证据、保密、图稿、知识库、成本与责任比较专利工作流选项。
专利 skill 对比LearningCNEditorial brief updated 2026-09-01
What you will learn
- Distinguish discovery, research, and drafting stages
- Produce a traceable disclosure draft
- Identify confidentiality and evidence boundaries
Before you start
- Basic Git and command-line usage
- Comfort reading a project README
You can explain the project, run its documented first step, and decide what to verify before adopting it.
Key takeaways
- 法律责任不能外包给自动化。
- 统一案件夹具才能比较。
- 组合式流程通常优于单一工具。
先看责任
技能库擅长结构化材料和可重复模板，人工代理师负责法律判断，定制 RAG 适合私有历史案件检索，通用聊天更适合早期解释。不要把生成速度当作合规能力。
Use the pinned source evidence, record versions and assumptions, and ask a qualified reviewer to validate the result before adopting it.
公平比较
用同一脱敏案件、同一专利类型和同一交付清单比较来源覆盖、图稿质量、修订追踪、保密边界、人工分钟数和退出路径。
组合使用
研发团队可以让 skill 负责扫描和草稿，让代理师负责检索与定稿，再把已脱敏案例沉淀到私有库；每个交接点都要有责任人。
Use the pinned source evidence, record versions and assumptions, and ask a qualified reviewer to validate the result before adopting it.
Decision guide
| Criterion | Option A | Option B |
|---|---|---|
| Best when | You need predictable behavior and easy auditing | You need adaptive optimization and have reliable telemetry |
| Main risk | May leave performance on the table | Can become difficult to explain or debug |
Implementation steps
- 1
定义证据、保密、类型和预算需求。
- 2
选择技能、人工和 RAG 候选。
- 3
运行同一脱敏案件并记录交付。
- 4
写下边界、责任和退出条件。
Copy-ready example
text
requirements -> candidates -> redacted case
evidence | secrecy | figures | review | cost -> handoff + exitFrequently asked questions
开源 skill 能替代专利代理师吗？
不能，它生成草稿和辅助材料，法律判断与提交仍需专业人员。
何时选定制 RAG？
当团队有足够脱敏历史案件且需要私有检索、评估和维护能力时。
Sources
- Patent Disclosure Skill README (captured 2026-08-31)Source checked 2026-08-31
- patent-disclosure-skill repositorySource checked 2026-08-31