Skill de patentes de China
Patent Skill: comparación entre skill, profesional y RAG
Evidencia, secreto, figuras, responsabilidad y coste.
Qué aprenderás
- Distinguish discovery, research, and drafting stages
- Produce a traceable disclosure draft
- Identify confidentiality and evidence boundaries
Antes de empezar
- Basic Git and command-line usage
- Comfort reading a project README
You can explain the project, run its documented first step, and decide what to verify before adopting it.
Conclusiones clave
- 法律责任不能外包给自动化。
- 统一案件夹具才能比较。
- 组合式流程通常优于单一工具。
先看责任
El skill estructura borradores, el profesional decide legalmente y RAG busca casos privados; compáralos con el mismo caso redactado.
Use the pinned source evidence, record versions and assumptions, and ask a qualified reviewer to validate the result before adopting it.
公平比较
用同一脱敏案件、同一专利类型和同一交付清单比较来源覆盖、图稿质量、修订追踪、保密边界、人工分钟数和退出路径。
组合使用
研发团队可以让 skill 负责扫描和草稿，让代理师负责检索与定稿，再把已脱敏案例沉淀到私有库；每个交接点都要有责任人。
Use the pinned source evidence, record versions and assumptions, and ask a qualified reviewer to validate the result before adopting it.
Cómo elegir
| Criterio | Opción A | Opción B |
|---|---|---|
| Best when | You need predictable behavior and easy auditing | You need adaptive optimization and have reliable telemetry |
| Main risk | May leave performance on the table | Can become difficult to explain or debug |
Pasos de implementación
- 1
定义证据、保密、类型和预算需求。
- 2
选择技能、人工和 RAG 候选。
- 3
运行同一脱敏案件并记录交付。
- 4
写下边界、责任和退出条件。
Ejemplo para copiar
requirements -> candidates -> redacted case
evidence | secrecy | figures | review | cost -> handoff + exitPreguntas frecuentes
开源 skill 能替代专利代理师吗？
不能，它生成草稿和辅助材料，法律判断与提交仍需专业人员。
何时选定制 RAG？
当团队有足够脱敏历史案件且需要私有检索、评估和维护能力时。
Fuentes
- Patent Disclosure Skill README (captured 2026-08-31)Fuente verificada 2026-08-31
- patent-disclosure-skill repositoryFuente verificada 2026-08-31