reverse-skill
reverse-skill 性能与成本：测量路由、工具启动与证据工作
建立路由延迟、工具索引、案例初始化、构件处理、报告和分析师时间基准。
你将学会
- Design a safe reverse-skill benchmark
- Allocate infrastructure and review cost
- Interpret speed versus evidence quality
开始前需要
- Basic Git and command-line usage
- Comfort reading a project README
You can explain the project, run its documented first step, and decide what to verify before adopting it.
先看结论
- Benchmark complete authorized cases and separate routing from tool startup.
- Include infrastructure, optional tool, storage, CI, and analyst-review cost.
- Never trade away scope, evidence, or review gates for speed.
Choose safe benchmark units
用安全夹具分别记录冷/热路由、索引刷新、工具启动、artifact/hash、报告 p50/p95、失败重试、CI 与人工复核，计算每份被接受报告的总成本，不削弱授权和证据门禁。
Pin OS, shell, Node/Python/Java versions, reverse-skill commit, tool-index state, fixture size, and client. Cold and warm runs answer different questions; label caches, downloads, and skipped tools explicitly.
Separate routing from tool cost
Record p50/p95 route time, rule count, index parsing, selected skill load, process startup, artifact bytes, hash time, report size, and failure/retry rate. A slow result may come from a fresh tool index or JVM startup rather than routing logic.
For multi-tool scenarios, report critical-path and parallelizable work separately. Never optimize by removing authorization, evidence, or review gates; those are correctness controls, not incidental overhead.
Price analyst and infrastructure time
Total cost includes host resources, optional licensed tools, storage, backups, network egress, CI minutes, and analyst triage/review. Calculate cost per accepted report or resolved finding, not per command, and keep estimates distinct from metered values.
Compare a pinned baseline with a candidate route or script change using the same fixture and expected evidence. A faster route that produces weaker provenance or more manual cleanup is not an improvement.
Publish an evidence-backed report
Store raw timings, tool-index snapshot, fixture hash, environment, route decision, output hashes, and review notes. Set budgets for route latency, disk retention, CI minutes, and case review time, then canary changes through the 173-case regression suite.
如何选择
| 比较维度 | 方案 A | 方案 B |
|---|---|---|
| Best when | You need predictable behavior and easy auditing | You need adaptive optimization and have reliable telemetry |
| Main risk | May leave performance on the table | Can become difficult to explain or debug |
实施步骤
- 1
Pin host, commit, tool index, fixture, and client.
- 2
Measure cold/warm routing, index, case, artifact, evidence, and report paths.
- 3
Calculate p50/p95, bytes, failures, CI, and human review cost.
- 4
Canary changes and publish raw receipts with acceptance criteria.
可复制示例
hint -> route p50/p95 -> tool/index startup
case-init -> artifact/hash -> report
resources + analyst review -> cost per accepted report常见问题
Is route latency the only performance metric?
No. Include tool discovery, case setup, artifact/evidence processing, report generation, failures, and analyst time.
Can I benchmark live pentesting targets?
Only with explicit authorization and a written scope; article fixtures should remain harmless and local.
资料来源
- reverse-skill README (captured 2026-08-31)来源核查 2026-08-31
- reverse-skill repository来源核查 2026-08-31